Cooley lawyers discuss safe harbor provision in bankruptcy code

Joe Conroy Partner and Chairman Cooley
Joe Conroy Partner and Chairman - Cooley
0Comments

Cooley lawyers Daniel Shamah, Dale Davis, and Miriam Peguero Medrano have contributed an article to the Creditor Rights Coalition. The piece examines the extensive reach of Bankruptcy Code Section 546(e)’s safe harbor provision, which offers protection for certain securities transactions against most avoidance claims.

The content is intended solely for informational purposes. Accessing or using this material does not establish an attorney-client relationship with Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any related entities collectively known as “Cooley.” Users are reminded that the information provided does not constitute legal advice and should not replace consultation with a qualified attorney in their jurisdiction. The content may be subject to change without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete or current. Past results do not ensure similar outcomes in future cases. Additionally, users are advised against sending confidential information to Cooley as there is no obligation to maintain confidentiality. This material may qualify as Attorney Advertising and is governed by applicable legal notices.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Christina Guerola Sarchio President Dechert

Dechert advises Pagaya on $300M inaugural securitization

Dechert has provided advisory services to Pagaya Technologies LTD on its first securitization of point-of-sale loans, known as POSH 2025-1.

David W. Barrett Executive Partner Faegre Drinker

UK introduces ‘failure to prevent fraud’ corporate offence effective September 2025

A new corporate offence of “failure to prevent fraud” is set to be enacted on September 1, 2025.

Gina M. Kastel Chair Faegre Drinker

Supreme Court clarifies NEPA’s scope in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition case

On May 29, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, No. 23-975.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Big Law Reporter.