Gibson Dunn lawyers explore tactics to bypass California’s noncompete ban

Barbara L. Becker Chair & Managing Partner Gibson
Barbara L. Becker Chair & Managing Partner - Gibson
0Comments

Gibson Dunn partners Katherine V.A. Smith and Harris M. Mufson, along with of counsel Justin M. DiGennaro, have addressed the issue of California’s noncompete ban in a Bloomberg Law article titled “California’s Noncompete Ban Getting Sidestepped in Court Rulings.” They discuss how employers are prevailing in federal court disputes by utilizing contractual choice-of-law provisions to bypass the state’s restrictions on noncompete agreements.

“Employers are winning federal court disputes involving California’s ban on noncompete agreements by enforcing contractual choice-of-law provisions,” they explain.

This analysis highlights a significant legal strategy being employed by companies to navigate around California’s stringent regulations on noncompete clauses, which typically aim to prevent employees from joining competitors after leaving a company.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Christina Guerola Sarchio President Dechert

Dechert advises Pagaya on $300M inaugural securitization

Dechert has provided advisory services to Pagaya Technologies LTD on its first securitization of point-of-sale loans, known as POSH 2025-1.

David W. Barrett Executive Partner Faegre Drinker

UK introduces ‘failure to prevent fraud’ corporate offence effective September 2025

A new corporate offence of “failure to prevent fraud” is set to be enacted on September 1, 2025.

Gina M. Kastel Chair Faegre Drinker

Supreme Court clarifies NEPA’s scope in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition case

On May 29, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, No. 23-975.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Big Law Reporter.